Le mercredi 21 avril 2010 à 19:28 +0200, Franck Joncourt a écrit : > ------ > Copyright (c) 1999 by Megginson Technologies. > Copyright (c) 2003 Ed Avis <ed@membled.com> > Copyright (c) 2004-2010 Joseph Walton <joe@kafsemo.org> > > No warranty. Commercial and non-commercial use freely permitted. > ------ This is clearly non-free, since it doesn’t allow modification and redistribution. > As it is intended to be as close to public domain as legally possible, he > pointed me out to the following URL: > > >From <http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/public-domain.html>: > > > All alleged advantages of a "public domain dedication" can be > > gained without uncertainty using a regular one-line licence statement, > > e.g., "Copyright (C) 2008 Owner Name. Do whatever you want with this work." > > Quoting upstream: > "This is exactly the form, and intent, of the original XML::Writer licence: > you may "Do whatever you want with this work." No. You may not, since it only permits use. > As I am not sure, which form of language would be the best to achieve this > goal? The simplest way to achieve that is probably the WTFPL. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part