Re: BOINC: lib/cal.h license issue agree with the DFSG?
Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> wrote:
> mdpoole@troilus.org wrote:
> >The usual argument is that choice of venue violates DFSG #5 by
> >discriminating against people who live outside the venue. Is there some
I feel it's some combination of DFSG 5 (discriminating on location)
and DFSG 1 (non-monetary cost of use), so it's not really clear-cut.
> The usual argument of the DFSG revisionists is that everything is a
> restriction or a discrimination, so it's not really helpful.
DFSG-revisionist Marco d'Itri posts much nonsense, from misattributed
quotes, to accusations that myself and others joining debian-legal since
2003 introduced new interpretations of the DFSG, including things which
had apparently been common since before 1999. Debunk him if you want
to try to quieten him for a bit.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/12/msg00161.html for
more detail.
Regards,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: