Re: Are these licenses DFSG?

["Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@debian.org>]

Florian Weimer wrote:
> * MJ Ray:
>
> > cate wrote:
> > > Eugen Dedu wrote:
> > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532456, about licenses
> > > I think there is a problem in terminology. AFAIK (but IANAL), the
> > > "any use" doesn't include distribution of software.
> > > For this reason I think it is safe to classify it as non distributable,
> > >
> > > It seems that the author intention was to interpret the "any use" in
> > > a wider manner, but this is not legally safe for us.
> > I'd agree with that unless someone can tell me why not.
>
> Surprise, surprise---it does include distribution:

ok, good! So IMHO (IANAL) the license is free according DFSG.

Unfortunately this statement was not in the original bug report.

The other licenses in bug report seems OK, but also this time I read only
the bug report + responses: I've not looked in the sources

ciao
	cate