Re: Porting library to different programming language (dnsruby vs. Net::Dns)

To: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, Alexd@nominet.org.uk
Subject: Re: Porting library to different programming language (dnsruby vs. Net::Dns)
From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:17:11 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 3221680d0909110717u38d27508t5ae28e69dcfcbe4b@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20090911131405.E9A73F7058@nail.towers.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 3221680d0909110203y79363f89yae016217e9966cd8@mail.gmail.com> <20090911131405.E9A73F7058@nail.towers.org.uk>

> I don't think debian-legal is a good place to seek the answer in a
> general way.  We're very much concerned about particular software and
> its suitability for debian main, rather than a general legal advice
> service for debian developers.  Maybe FSFE's FTF or the SFLC could
> give general advice?

Well, dnsruby sits in NEW...  that's why I am asking.

Ondrej
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
http://blog.rfc1925.org/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Porting library to different programming language (dnsruby vs. Net::Dns)
  - From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Porting library to different programming language (dnsruby vs. Net::Dns)
Next by Date: Package emacs-chess-pieces license problem?
Previous by thread: Re: Porting library to different programming language (dnsruby vs. Net::Dns)
Next by thread: Package emacs-chess-pieces license problem?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread