Re: distributing precompiled binaries

[MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>]

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: [...]
> A recent (Dec 2008) addition with no grounding in the DFSG.  If I see PDFs
> being rejected with this rationale when it's not a question of license
> compliance (PDFs distributed under the GPL certainly have to have source
> with them, but that's not a DFSG matter), I certainly intend to dispute it.

I disagree, seeing PDFs as being like intermediate code rather than
source code, but both gammu and remuco claim to be under the GPL, so
require good source for their applets, so let's not have this debate
here now.

Regards,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct