Re: enabling transport and on storage encryption in bacula on debian build
Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com> writes:
> 1. Build it from source yourself (perfectly legal -- only distribution
> violates the GPL license).
The question is whether it is legal to distribute the Bacula sources
(including parts depending on OpenSSL) to begin with. These are
uncertain legal grounds to say the least.
> 2. Wait for version 3.0.0 (currently in Beta testing as version
> 2.5.28-b1). This version has no licensing problems (pointer to
> details for version 2.4.x provided by John) and so Debian will be
> able to release it with OpenSSL compiled in.
Ah, that's good to hear!
Hendrik
Reply to: