On Thu Jan 24 11:37, John Halton wrote: > It seems clear enough that the administrators of toad are > "propagating" /bin/ls. And that "propagation" is one that "enables > other parties to make or receive copies". Nor is this "mere > interaction ... with no transfer of a copy" - *running* /bin/ls would > fit this category, but making a copy of /bin/ls in your home directory > is a different matter. > > So this would seem to be "conveying" within the meaning of GPL v.3, > and thus will fall within clause 6 of GPL v.3, "Conveying Non-Source > Forms". So, do we need to have the sources all installed on our shell hosts? or a written offer good for three years to provide the source? Maybe having a deb-src line is good enough since users can run apt-get source? Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature