Re: Warranty disclaimers with SHOUTY CAPITALS
"John Halton" <email@example.com> writes:
> I have a (slightly old) edition of Rennie's "Computer and Internet
> Contracts and Law" (a leading English software precedents
> looseleaf), and the notes state as follows in a number of contracts:
> "USA: NOTE: In all States in the USA (except Louisiana) all
> disclaimers of warranty of merchantability or warranty of fitness
> for any particular purpose must be conspicuous and are usually in
> boldface or uppercase (capital) print or both."
The law, as described here, is an ass.
Writing a long passage in SHOUTY CAPITALS makes it "conspicuous", yes;
but, unlike a change of font or boldface, it becomes *less readable*,
and so less likely that the consumer will read it, than if it were in
the same mixed case as the rest of the text.
> According to the commentary, this is a requirement of the Uniform
> Commercial Code. (Quick forage on Wikipedia). Here you go:
Thanks for the reference. It's too bad the code in this case has the
opposite effect of the ostensible purpose: to help the consumer read
the important parts.
> So it appears the legal requirement is for the disclaimer to be
> "conspicuous". However, it's difficult to see how you can achieve
> this in plain text other than by SHOUTY CAPITALS, alas.
By surrounding the passage with lines of separator characters above
and below, would be one suggestion that I consider superior to SHOUTY
(Good sigmonster, have a cookie)
\ "It's my belief we developed language because of our deep inner |
`\ need to complain." -- Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin |