[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Choosing a License: GNU APL? AFL 3.0?

Le dimanche 30 décembre 2007 à 08:55 +0000, Sean B. Palmer a écrit :
> I'm looking for a permissive license, of the Modified BSD or MIT
> variety, but I'd like for the copyright notices in each file to be
> protected without having to include the whole license itself, if it's
> more than a few lines.
> The Modified BSD, for example, only protects "the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer", so a
> simple notice that says "Licensed under the Modified BSD License"
> wouldn't be protected unless I included the whole license in each
> file. Therefore it's not sufficient.

I think the WTFPL is exactly what you are looking for. It meets all your
requirements, is DFSG-free, and several Debian packages are already
using it.

: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: