On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:06:22 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote:
> Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> asked:
> > Are there many other greynesses in how the SC and the DFSG are
> > interpreted?
>
> Amazingly few, but yes,
[...]
> Licences are another type of greyness: unlike Mozilla's software, it's
> very easy to produce a modifiable licence from the GPL by removing
> one component. Should the preamble be regarded as part of the name?
In my opinion regarding the preamble as part of the name would be a huge
stretch. I don't think it should be seen that way.
[...]
> Which is more important: free software or GNU branding?
Heh, in my opinion, free software, for sure.
But I'm not quite sure some famous FSF representative shares this
opinion... :-(
P.S.: why did this message break the thread on both -legal and -vote?
the web archive says that one of the referenced messages is "not
available"... :-?
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/etch_workstation_install.html
Need to read a Debian etch installation walk-through?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpcSeqQy5Ko9.pgp
Description: PGP signature