On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:47:26 +0200 Allison Randal wrote: > The Artistic License 2.0 has been approved by the OSI, but not > explicitly reviewed by debian-legal. Would you like to review it? Before reading the license terms in detail, I gave a look at the FSF license list[1], which states: | Artistic License 2.0 | | This license is a free software license, compatible with the GPL | thanks to the relicensing option in section 4(c)(ii). That is to say: according to the FSF, the Artistic License 2.0 is compatible with the GNU GPL. This should guarantee that the license meets the DFSG, I would say. The usual disclaimers: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP. [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp6b9cIczciP.pgp
Description: PGP signature