Re: Ogre demos distribution
Stephen Gran <email@example.com> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, MJ Ray said:
> > Andres Mejia <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: [...]
> > >=20
> > > You may use this sample code for anything you like, it is not covered b=
> y the
> > > LGPL like the rest of the engine."
> > No clear permission to modify or distribute. I think it needs clarifying.
> > Sorry.
> While it might be useful to get that clarified, I think the intent is
> fairly clear.
How can one tell that they intend 'use' to mean 'use, copy, distribute and
modify' or something like that? It's not obvious from the written text and
we've encountered the opposite case before (PINE, seyon pre-GPL, IIRC).
I think lack of explicit permission has been a barrier to main in the past
and it still should be now. See bug #20914 for example.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct