[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: is the "lucent public license" DFSG-free?



On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:38:56 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:

> Le samedi 22 septembre 2007 à 13:18 +0200, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> > The whole license is CPL-based.  
> 
> Indeed. I guess that settles the issue.

I have to disagree.

Unfortunately I do not have the time to do a detailed license analysis,
at present.  But you yourself, as well as others on this list, found
some issues in the license.
Nonetheless, as soon as a similar license which seems to be accepted
is pointed out, you seem to be ready to close your eyes and pretend
the issues have vanished, magically.
I cannot understand the rationale for that...


IANADD, TINASOTODP.



-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
 Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpUzfVgfKfgl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: