> Music in digital form, being digitially-stored information, *is*
> software :-) As Eben Moglen said, it's foolish to try to
> distinguish different freedoms for a bitstream depending on how
> those bits happen to be interpreted at some point in time.
That sounds like an argument against the GFDL licence.
I am convinced that it is, yes.
IF Eben Moglen really belived that, why did he allow rms to create
that license?
That presumes that Eben was in any position to "allow" RMS to do
anything. In any case, you'd have to ask him.