Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 23:22, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 25 septembre 2007 à 15:14 +0200, Kern Sibbald a écrit :
> > Thanks for looking up the above -- very interesting.
> > However, the concept of deleting parts of the license don't appeal to me.
> > I prefer the following which is a modification of my prior license that
> > was accepted by Debian. The modification makes my prior license a bit
> > more specific -- i.e. it restricts it to OSI licensed libraries.
> Well, any exception that you add to the GPL can be removed, this is by
> design of the GPL. This is also true of the other wording you suggested.
It isn't really important, but I'd be surprised if that is true as it the
author of the code can decide anything he/she wants by modifying the GPL.