Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
Thomas Dickey <email@example.com> writes:
>> As far as I know, the FSF doesn't forbid anyone to use GPL with an
>> OpenSSL exception.
> That's entirely possible, but you haven't provided an example which
> isn't contaminated by self-interest on the part of FSF. If you can
> provide such an example, there's something to discuss.
The FSF cannot change the license on code they don't own. As far as I
understand, what you are looking for do not appear to be possible from a
legal point of view. I'm assuming that you would regard any FSF owned
code to be "contaminated" by the FSFs' self-interest.
What kind of example are you looking for?