Re: Bacula: GPL and OpenSSL
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:57:22PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> However, I have now removed *all* modifications, so that the current Bacula
> code as of a few hours ago has no modifications to GPL v2. I am attaching a
> copy of the current LICENSE file as it is at this moment in the SVN
I'm not quite following; what modifications have you removed here?
Is this still current, BTW? In a later message you mentioned changing
the OpenSSL exemption to a "note frmo the author", but still in the
LICENSE file. I wonder if Debian could consider that legally
sufficient?
Reply to: