Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:13:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It is a freedom that I have by default; if I accept the CDDL I no longer
> have that freedom[1]. [...]
> [1] Technically, not the right to "choose a venue", but the right to not be
> sued in a venue where I have no legal presence.
Err, that's not a violation of your rights, it's a waste of the court's
time... If the court doesn't see it as a waste of its time, and issues
you with a summons anyway, you're involved. Cf [0]. You might as
well say you've got the "right" not to be flamed on a list you're not
subscribed to.
Cheers,
aj
[0] http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1557842,00.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>