Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:49:54PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If you're claiming "you don't get to exercise your right to argue
> about jurisdiction" is equivalent to "you must pet a cat", then, IMO,
> you need to argue the same thing about "you don't get to exercise your
> patent rights".
You're aware that most of the people arguing that choice of venue clauses
are non-free also hold the opinion that patent non-enforcement as a
condition of the copyright license is also non-free?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: discussion with the FSF: GPLv3, GFDL, Nexenta
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>