Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <46113667.50307@ucsc.edu>, Suraj N. Kurapati
<skurapat@ucsc.edu> writes
The MIT license has the following properties (from Ed Burnette's
survey[3] of free software licenses):
4. Source to bug fixes and modifications must be released? No
I tried to modify the conditions paragraph of the MIT license so
that question 4 (shown above) is given a "Yes" answer.
If that's what you want, look at the LGPL.
Thanks for your suggestion, but it seems I had oversimplified my
intentions when I wrote the above. One of my intentions was to
specify a set of basic requirements for my source code and not go
far as to restrict the code to a particular license. That is, I want
to allow my code to be sucked into any superset license.
In this manner, I feel the LGPL is too restrictive because since it
narrows down its list of superset licenses to only LGPL and GPL.