On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:23:40AM -0800, Sean Kellogg wrote:
>
> So, from the lawyer's perspective, it is a matter of client-attorney
> privilege. SPI now has to make the decision that full disclosure to the
> public via d-l is worth the potential risk of losing that protection. My
> guess would be the lawyer has done the research on how one could bring suit
> against Debian/SPI/3rd party and disclosure would be like handing a roadmap
> to "the enemy." You generally want to make the cost of bringing suit against
> you as high as possible to warred off long-shot litigation.
>
OK. Makes perfect sense to me.