[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GFDL with no invariants/covers, is ok?

On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:09:05PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> make package had stripped all of the documentation due to GFDL. remake's
> author doesn't mind bending licensing for his own .texi file (used for
> ..info etc) specific for debugging facilities of remake. He
> suggested following terms (which btw were used in another package
> shipped in debian):

  You could have googled a bit: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpwMZJHsOAIc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: