On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:37:08 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:06:13 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > OTOH, if CC intends that this clause prevents ever making the Work > > > available on TPM-encumbered media (which I don't think is the > > > plain-text reading of this clause), I don't believe it's > > > DFSG-compliant. > > > AFAICT, CC seems to interpret the clause this way, since the > > explicit parallel distribution proviso was *removed* because of > > strong opposition from many people at a CC summit... > > AFAICT, you're speculating based on the same limited information that > I have at my disposal. Yes, I admit I am. > There are many reasons someone might object to > such a clause that *don't* contradict our goals, and I want to hear > CC's own answer to this question. I would be interested too. Has anyone from the Debian Creative Commons Workgroup already asked for a clarification? -- But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpspdw5Hx4bZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature