On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:56:30 -0600 Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:48 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT
> > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A
> > custom license is not something that we want to write, and
> > especially not without serious thought and consideration between
> > people who have a great deal of experience in writing licenses.
> >
> > Contributing to license proliferation by a license which is not
> > compatible with the GPL and some other free software licenses is not
> > something that we want to do.
>
> Thank you for saying that before I could get around to it, Don. I
> strongly agree.
Needless to say, I agree too (as it should already be clear from my
other contributions to this discussion...).
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpSk1FWVuasZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature