On 12/12/2006, at 10:50 AM, Francesco Poli wrote:
The clarification from MJ Ray regarding DFSG#4 made me think that each distinct copyright holder had a veto power on _one_ Font Name. At least I hoped it was so, since if each copyright holder can reserve an arbitrary list of Font Names, the restriction can easily grow up to the level it makes finding a non-reserved name nearly impossible.
Am I the only one who begins to see DFSG#4 as a slippery slope?
Am I the only one who remembers what the "G" stands for? Cheers, Nick