On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:58:05 +1100 Ben Finney wrote: > All of those need to be qualified by *whose* GPL; that's why the > recommendation for licensing a work under the GPL is "[...] GNU > General Public License, as published by the Free Software Foundation > [...]". Yeah, I'm well aware of this. It was even already mentioned in the previous thread (on this same list) about the topic under discussion. I apologize for not putting a clear notice to debian-legal participants: this thread started with a clarification request to <licensing@gnu.org>, where I Cc:ed debian-legal, just to notify that the question has been asked to the FSF and that a public response from them was desired. Hope that explains. -- But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpew3ORi9lI6.pgp
Description: PGP signature