arnoud@engelfriet.net wrote: >> No, it does not. As usual, you are just inventing new requirements which >> are not specified by the DFSG. >Perhaps. But how can software be considered 'free' if no >useful source code is available? By following the DFSG. >Obviously there's no single definition for all cases. I know people This is not a good reason for inventing ad hoc definitions. -- ciao, Marco