Re: [Fwd: Re: Problem with license of msv-xsdlib]
On Sep 7, 2006, at 14:59, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
Background of question 3 is that someone on the list might have an
which other license could be acceptable to Sun (and I might suggest
msv itself is under the new three-point BSD license plus a nuclear
facility acknowledgement. Is there a particular reason why Sun isn't
licensing the msv extensions under the same license?