Re: Licence for a file in tstat: is it compatible with Debian?
>> even raised as an example of free licenses in the DFSG.
>This is wrong. This http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
>is not 4-clause BSD license, since the obnoxious 3rd clause is removed:
This is not relevant, since the advertising clause was removed well
after the DFSG was written.
Also, a 3-clause BSD license is usually called "MIT license" (or "X11
license") to remark the difference with the original BSD license.
Even if it actually *is* the new BSD license, the file name on
www.debian.org is misleading.