Re: Sun Java available from non-free
Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
> debian-legal, OTOH, claims that not only is the stock MIT/X11 licence
> 'non-free', but 'it is impractical to work with such software'.
I don't believe that those claims are consensual on debian-legal. The
MIT/X11 licence is frequently recommended by participants, including me.
It's short, flexible and relatively clear for a licence.
Please give sources for quotes. The archive search did not find
that second phrase *anywhere* on debian-legal.
About the policy comment, I refer to my reply to Wouter Verhelst a
few minutes ago.
Hope that explains,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: