Re: PHP license style [was: Re: licenses with name changing clauses]
Francesco Poli <email@example.com>
> On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
> > Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving the package's filename
> > (arguably acceptable to ensure integrity) but the names of many
> > possible derivatives/competitors.
> Does this mean that you agree with me that the super-name-change clause
> of PHP License version 3.01 fails to comply with the DFSG?
Please don't cut my messages unmarked. The cut part should have made
it clear that I view these restrictions as more comedy than problems.
Also, this one was about filenames, not package names.
Finally, please don't send personal messages to me to mailing lists.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct