Re: Sun Java available from non-free
On 5/22/06, Anthony Towns <email@example.com> wrote:
The questions asked weren't "Is this okay for non-free?" it's "Did you
mean ____ or ____ when you wrote ____?". The answers to those latter
questions are, ttbomk, all included in the FAQ, which is why ignoring
it just wastes everyone's time.
If the FAQ weren't so obviously full of lies, maybe it wouldn't be ignored.
That said, (IANAL) the people who have said on this thread that the
estoppel thing doesn't apply outside the US or whatever seem to be
ignoring the choice of law clause.