[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bacula license (was Re: Help Selecting License for Bacula Documentation

> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:10:30PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
>> That's how I understand the clause too. Contaminates other software
>> (DFSG 9).
>> I'm amazed it got into main. Serious bug.
> How does that contaminate other software?  I agree that there may be a
> problem, but only for users of Bacula.

I would like to understand that as well, especially since I explicitly
indicate in LICENSE that certain parts of the code not copyrighted by
myself are licensed under the GPL with no modifications.

John, could you or someone else summarize a bit where we are assuming the

- I delete the anti-abuse paragraph from the LICENSE entitled:
  "Termination for IP or Patent Action".

- I change the manual license to be GPL v2.

Specifically, what I would like to know is: are there any other problems
with the licensing?

Best regards, Kern

Reply to: