Re: Bug#365408: [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Cc'ing to debian-legal: summary:
The major question is about replacing java1-runtime, java1-compiler,
java2-runtime and java2-compiler virtual packages by classpath-jre,
classpath-jdk for free java implementation and java-jre and java-jdk for
non-free implementations. More informations on the bug report #365408.
Thanks to Cc to the bug report.
Charles Fry a écrit :
> But I strongly disagree with using classpath-* for free versions, and
> saving java for non-free implementations. That encourages the use of the
> non-free implementations.
No because java programs that work with free implementations will depend
> How about java-* for both free and non-free, and then if some package
> explicitely requires non-free they can depend on sun-java5-jre.
I think we have to ask on debian-legal about this but I'm sure we cannot
use the java word if it's not something that has been approved by Sun.
: :' :rnaud
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----