[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sun Java available from non-free

On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:01 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Could someone please explain to me why paragraph 2(f) does not pose a
> problem? I couldn't find ANY discussion about the license on Debian legal
> which surprises me a little bit, but then maybe I just missed the
> relevant parts of the license. Anyway, as a non-lawyer I'm surprised
> that we seem to accept that we have to "defend and indemnify Sun".

Did you read the accompanying FAQ? Question 12 addresses your concern.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: