[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Would cxxtools need an exception for libssl too?

"Kari Pahula" <kaol@debian.org> wrote in message [🔎] 20060512113818.GA22626@sammakko.yok.utu.fi">news:[🔎] 20060512113818.GA22626@sammakko.yok.utu.fi...
I've an ITP, #366834, on a library called cxxtools (which already
created a bit of controversy on -devel).  The reason I'm packaging
cxxtools is because tntnet (ITP #361010) uses it.

Both are licensed under GPLv2 or later.

Tntnet links to libssl, which is GPL-incompatible.  Upstream already
added an exception to tntnet to allow linking to libssl, but would
cxxtools need one also?  Both have the same upstream.

Would this scenario imply libssl+cxxtools to be a derived work?

Hmm... RMS would probably say so. Others may disagree. The safest bet is
to ask upstream for a licence exception.

Reply to: