I've an ITP, #366834, on a library called cxxtools (which already created a bit of controversy on -devel). The reason I'm packaging cxxtools is because tntnet (ITP #361010) uses it. Both are licensed under GPLv2 or later. Tntnet links to libssl, which is GPL-incompatible. Upstream already added an exception to tntnet to allow linking to libssl, but would cxxtools need one also? Both have the same upstream. Would this scenario imply libssl+cxxtools to be a derived work?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature