Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:37:14AM +0400, olive wrote:If that is what you think, you must first have the DFSG changed *before* declaring the license non-free.No, I must not do any such thing. And who are you to tell me I must?
I mean "you have to"; being not a native English speaker; I have used the word "must" in a wrong context; please forgive me. However I do not see *anything* in the DFSG which let think that choice of venue is non-free. Although I do not share this point of view; you might think that we should add a rule saying they are not free: this is a legitimate though. It is not legitimate however to declare them non-free just because you do not like it and then abusively say that it is non free according to DFSG.
Olive