On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:30:32 +0100 Achim Bohnet wrote: > You may not modify the Documentation. As already pointed out by Andrew Donnellan, Documentation is non-free: it actually fails DFSG#3. [...] > 6. GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION. [...] > Any dispute arising out of or > related to this Agreement shall be brought in the courts of Santa > Clara County, California, USA. This is a choice of venue and is considered non-free by many debian-legal contributors (including me...). In a nutshell, this choice of venue discriminates against people who live far away from Santa Clara County, California, USA and thus fail DFSG#5. Those people can be forced to travel around the planet in order to defend themselves in a dispute raised by the copyright holder. [...] > MetadataFrameworkSDK.09.13.01_10:44 > > > > > > > ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED > > LICENCE DE LOGICIEL LIBRE [...] There seem to be two versions of the license: one is drafted in English, the other in French. It is not clear to me which version is the official one. Or are they both official and any of them may be chosen, at the recipient's option? Since I'm not qualified to read French legalese, I cannot check if the two versions have indeed the exact same meaning (which is not easy to accomplish...). -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpGfz3_ZIUnh.pgp
Description: PGP signature