On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:47:16 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote: > > 4. If the Fonts are augmented pursuant to Section 3(b), the name > > used to denote the resulting fonts set shall not include the > > term ___STIX___ or any similar term, and any distribution or > > sale of the resulting fonts set must be free of charge unless > > the work is distributed or sold as part of a larger software > > package. > [...] > > Likely to be DFSG Free, but problematic. > > I don't agree that this clause is DFSG-free. > It says that the name of an augmented font cannot *include* the term > STIX or *any similar* term. My statement applies to section 5 which you elided, not section 4, which I didn't even bother to address (beyond the part which gets addressed in section 5.) Don Armstrong -- Fate and Temperament are two words for one and the same concept. -- Novalis [Hermann Hesse _Demian_] http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature