Francesco Poli wrote: > For instance, names such as STIX++, STIXng, newSTIX, STIXER, STICS, > STHIX, and so forth, are banned by the above clause, but they are > *different* from the original name, and thus comply with the maximum > DFSG-allowed restriction on names. OTOH, were STIX a trademark (and it might be, haven't checked), all those names would most liekly be prohibited by trademark law.