Re: Moglen's "all good faith"
On 1/20/06, Andrew Donnellan <email@example.com> wrote:
> There are some (bad) parts in the linux kernel that are not GPL, and
> even some parts which could be considered non-free. Look through the
> individual file copyright notices.
Sorry, but under Moglen's own theory, it is enough to have a tiny piece
of GNU GPL'd code to make the entire "program" (in this case kernel
"as a whole", user space aside for a moment [RMS includes that as well])
GNU GPL'd. And, BTW, how come that the FSF's "compliance lab" didn't
purify the kernel of *GNU*/Linux?