Re: Distributing GPL software.
On 1/17/06, Samuel E RIFFLE <sRiffle@cox.net> wrote:
> I am not authorized to offer a legal opinion, but the above is a "common
> sense", practitioner oriented reading of the terms of the GPL.
Except that you were mostly reading the manifesto part of the GPL
which doesn't belong to T&C operative for that license agreement
(let's assume acceptance arguendo) and is as irrelevant as another
part ("#SEC4" link you seem to like so much) that follows the T&C.