[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: the FSF's GPLv3 launch conference

On 1/7/06, Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
> The obvious conclusion one would draw from this is that there are no
> competitors to Linux or, at least, that all the existing ones are
> quickly being killed off. However, a quick examination of reality shows
> this not to be the case.

It doesn't have to be the case for an action under 16 of the Clayton
Act for threatened harm caused by violation of 1 of the Sherman Act
to succeed.

> Every mention of a "uncharged co-conspirator" is hillarious as well.

Perhaps because you don't understand what it means as well. It
means uncharged parties which entered into GPL agreement and
performed accordingly.


Reply to: