Re: the FSF's GPLv3 launch conference
On 1/7/06, Anthony DeRobertis <email@example.com> wrote:
> The obvious conclusion one would draw from this is that there are no
> competitors to Linux or, at least, that all the existing ones are
> quickly being killed off. However, a quick examination of reality shows
> this not to be the case.
It doesn't have to be the case for an action under 16 of the Clayton
Act for threatened harm caused by violation of 1 of the Sherman Act
> Every mention of a "uncharged co-conspirator" is hillarious as well.
Perhaps because you don't understand what it means as well. It
means uncharged parties which entered into GPL agreement and