On Wednesday 30 November 2005 05:00, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:57:31PM +0100, Claudio Moratti wrote: [cut] > Why don't you keep an unapplied patch in ./debian/ which can be used > to change the name? Then, if there is ever a problem, its trivial to > fix. AIUI this is the kind of approach that might be taken with > firefox.. The patch might be trivial; or, you might initially think > that it is trivial, but then keep running into different instances of > the TM name. So you might start with such a patch, however small and > trivial, but maintain it as you discover hypothetical internal > references to the name. I'll try to do that... This is the first time I have to change the name of a complete package... This will be a funny thing :D > I know little of trademarks, and about your specific one, but not > packaging the software because of such a problem, when it could be > worked around, is still unattrictive. Thank you for you answer! > Justin Cheers Claudio -- ~~>MaXeR <~~ Home: http://www.knio.it Community http://www.debianizzati.org - http://guide.debianizzati.org GnuPG Key: 0x34337C08
Attachment:
pgpNUeUlettM5.pgp
Description: PGP signature