Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

[Arnaud Limbourg <arnaud@limbourg.com>]

Can you please make this another thread, this is outside the scope of 
the original message :)

Arnaud.

Ian Eure wrote:

> On Tuesday 23 August 2005 09:34 pm, Justin Patrin wrote:
>  
>
> > On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <ieure@php.net> wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:
> > >      
> > >
> > > > I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say,
> > > > the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type code a lot better
> > > > IMO). To have the license require distribution of PHP is a little
> > > > odd. What I'm a tad more confused about is why anyone would maintain
> > > > their packages through apt instead of pear.
> > > >
> > > > pear upgrade Package_Name
> > > >
> > > > - or -
> > > >
> > > > pear upgrade-all
> > > >
> > > > Translates about as well as "apt-get install php4-pear-package-name"
> > > > I would think.
> > > >