Re: Code of conduct and MUAs [was: Re: LGPL module linked with a GPL lib]
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Code of conduct and MUAs [was: Re: LGPL module linked with a GPL lib]
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
- Date: 06 Aug 2005 16:48:38 GMT
- Message-id: <[🔎] 42f4e9e5$0$50744$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net>
- References: <D983A82B2EE1D211BED00008C7330586079F7DE9@almg-nt9.almg.uucp> <1122484029.4133.54.camel@laptop1> <625a0e6505072712002e88129f@mail.gmail.com> <1122499014.4133.135.camel@laptop1> <625a0e6505072716048bd2293@mail.gmail.com> <20050729000520.1acbdb26.frx@winstonsmith.info> <625a0e6505072817065593921b@mail.gmail.com> <20050729185941.357523a7.frx@winstonsmith.info> <625a0e65050729130765e1619e@mail.gmail.com> <20050730171559.14222a69.frx@winstonsmith.info>
Francesco Poli <frx@winstonsmith.info> wrote:
> IIRC, the code of conduct says that the canonical way to ask to be Cc:ed
> on replies is setting an appropriate Mail-Followup-To: field.
> Asking the same in the message body (in natural language) is a useful
> reminder for users of MUAs that do not automatically honour the
> Mail-Followup-To: field.
>
> Am I correct?
Not as far as I can tell. The code of conduct doesn't mention
MFT. I'm not surprised, because MFT is a controversial
non-working invented header which failed to get standardised
and is only supported by a few mailers. Mention your CC wish
in your sig if you feel strongly.
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: