Re: CECILL license status?

[Achim Bohnet <ach@mpe.mpg.de>]

On Thursday 28 July 2005 09:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Achim Bohnet:
> 
> > [please cc me, i'm not subscribed to d-l]
> > Hi,
> > new digikamimageplugin > 0.7.3 release
> >
> > a) contains now a header file that uses the CeCILL license.
> >  http://www.cecill.info/index.en.html
> >  http://www.cecill.info/licences.en.html
> >
> > b) this header file is included in files distributed under GPL.
> 
> Doesn't this mean that the author makes use of the GPL option in the
> CeCILL license?

Hi, [sorry for the late response.]

No, by included I mean '#include file_under_cecill.h' in a GPL file.

Here the actual code: file under CECILL license: 
    http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikamimageplugins/common/cimgiface/CImg.h?rev=409209&view=auto
is '##include "CImg.h"'d included in the GPL file:
    http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikamimageplugins/common/cimgiface/cimgiface.h?rev=437528&view=auto

Achim
-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com