[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New 'Public Domain' Licence



On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:39:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2005, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > telling me that I can freely distribute the part that is Lua has no
> > value, since I can't actually do so (it's tucked away inside a
> > binary; if I want Lua, I'll go download the source).
> 
> The" value" it has is informing you that some part of that codebase is
> "Lua" and that you can go download the source to "Lua" to get at that
> part of the codebase... or, you can reverse engineer that portion of
> the code to get back at "Lua"... or exercise any other right (useful
> or not) that the MIT license gives you. [Most of this issue here is
> just a straight forward problem with non-copyleft licenses...]

You mean that the "problem" is that permissive licenses don't serve the
goals of a copyleft?  They're not supposed to.  The goal (or at least
one very common goal) of permissive licenses is to encourage free use
of code, and it's understandable that people with this philosophy don't
want to force people to include a useless license block, either.

Actually, nothing about the MIT license says anything about telling
people that you use a library, or that you can get it anywhere.  A
copy of the Lua license is attached, just as an example: the word "Lua"
appears nowhere in the license.  Including the license doesn't even give
any hint about Lua, unless you already know it exists!

You can't reverse-engineer that portion of the code to get back at "Lua",
because there's no way to tell which parts are Lua, which parts have had
copyrightable modifications applied which are not under Lua's license,
and which parts are entirely unrelated to Lua.  I don't see any benefit
in twisting people's arms to put big blobs of text informing people that
it's theoretically legal to do something, when it's neither possible nor
useful in practice.  Telling people this is just wasting their time.

(The warranty disclaimer is another issue, though.)

-- 
Glenn Maynard
Copyright (C) 2003,2004 Tecgraf, PUC-Rio.

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.


Reply to: