Re: RES: What makes software copyrightable anyway?
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:17:27PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 5/13/05, Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> wrote:
> > > Mind you, this is a collective work, and we will also distribute the
> > > pieces individually. But "we sometimes don't distribute the work"
> > > is not equivalent to "we do not distribute the work".
>
> And yet somehow this work can get on the user's machine, starting
> from a bare machine and Debian media.
>
> > The work you are speaking of does not exist in our archives, as far as I can
> > tell. It can only be built on a user's machine. The resulting work would
> > not be distributable.
>
> How do you account for it getting onto user machines?
I'm done here. You are obviously more interested in trolling or spreading
FUD than having a conversation.
--Adam
Reply to: